10/06/2026
I've recently heard and read authoritative figures in the industry arguing that we're living in a Dark Ages of car design.
An era often ruled by confusion, where paradoxically, the almost unlimited availability of technological tools translates into a proliferation of cars overloaded with unnecessary, complex, and often incomprehensible signs, functions, and devices.
This is partly attributable to a number of contingent factors: the ongoing technological revolution with the advent of the EVs; the rise of new dominant markets (such as China) with a different aesthetic sensibility; new generations of digital-native users who view the car more as an extension of their digital world, rather than an emotional simulacrum linked to the mechanical and performance dimension.
However, we want to focus here on the topic closest to our hearts—good design: in the current context, with the increasing importance of the car's digital component and a global market that must satisfy users with very different needs and sensibilities, is it still possible to produce cars with truly innovative design, comparable to the masterpieces of the past?
A few years ago, Jony Ive said, " The better way is to go deeper with the simplicity... You have to deeply understand the essence of a product in order to be able to get rid of the parts that are not essential.... To be truly simple, you have to go really deep."
Words that still seem completely agreeable today, yet at the same time sound like a contradiction in light of the latest work by Ive and his team in the automotive field…
Cars like the Fiat Panda, Renault Espace, and Mini Minor were revolutionary because of their concept: a complex synthesis where the study of packaging and interior space, mechanical layout, usage scenarios, general formal conception, proportions, and detail design all appeared in wonderful harmony. This is what is properly meant by a "design project," and in this light, even the much-debated Fiat Multipla appears today as a highly innovative car when its overall concept is carefully observed.
Today, however, what are actually entirely insignificant gadgets are marketed as innovations: illuminated grilles or logos, dozens of little lights turning the cabin into a nightclub, cameras for taking selfies while driving, amplifiers that reproduce artificial sounds to mimic an engine that is no longer there… these are just a few examples, but there are dozens more. As a result, cars increase in weight and cost, with no real functional benefit or improvement to the overall concept.
Let us also add the issue of driving aids—drowsiness alerts, speed limit warnings, etc.—imposed by regulatory authorities (the EU above all) and in many cases totally useless, given that 99% of drivers turn them off every time they start the car… Here too, we see an increase in weight and complexity, with no real utility.
The impression is that cars are being filled with baroque superstructures and ornaments to hide, in most cases, the poverty of the underlying concept. But as Coco Chanel used to say, "Simplicity is the keynote of all true elegance."
The silhouette of the Mercedes 190, with its perfect proportions, was not only a remarkable aesthetic concept, but also immediately expressed the sober elegance, solidity and rigor of the Mercedes brand, bringing those very values into a market segment that had been unexplored until then. Form, construction, emotion and consistency with the brand's history—all aspects were fully and organically encapsulated in the car's design. Looking at some of the latest Mercedes models, it is difficult to see the same coherence, amidst gigantic screens and a riot of multicolored lights that seem to betray the brand's tradition of refined elegance.
Similarly, the BMW 1602, with its sporty and dynamic lines, perfectly translated the brand's values and history—sporty soul, superbe mechanics, refined details—bringing them into a segment within reach of the middle class, while maintaining coherence and clarity of concept. Here too, it's difficult to discern the same coherence in some current BMW models, amidst overdesigned details and gigantic grilles that appear out of proportion.
Yet the hope is that from this phase of experimentation, at times confusing and overly baroque, a new generation of designers will emerge, who will refocus on the value of design as simplicity, clarity of content and meaning, and formal balance. Often visiting design schools, I encounter everywhere immense talent ready to express itself, and I trust that this drive for innovation, if properly guided, can soon lead to a new Renaissance in car design.
Similarly, even in today industry there are excellent examples of a potential reversal of the trend: consider the work of M. Frascella, first at JLR and now at Audi, where with the Concept C and then even more with the recent Nuvolari, he embodied a new aesthetic based on simplicity, proportions, clean design and precision of detail. Exactly what we imagine when we think of an Audi.
Or consider the Dacia Hipster, a city car concept centered on radical rationality and functionality, which are also coherently translated into an essential aesthetic language, reminding, in my opinion, of Giugiaro's first Panda.
Ultimately, just as the Middle Ages, despite its obscurantism, already contained the early seeds that would later develop until the Renaissance, so today we are confident in a Renaissance in car design too.
A movement that shuns the superfluous, unnecessary frills and the sensationalist gadget to focus on essence and coherence. A cultural shift that produces cars that are both rational and emotional, with clear design concept and able of translating the enormous technological capabilities available today into simple-to-use and truly useful features.
____
Written and edited by M. Tonin