04/13/2026
As I prepare for our investigation on May 6th, I have realized the necessity of reorganizing my equipment cases. This task, as you can imagine, is not straightforward. I am a firm believer in organization and meticulous attention to detail. Each piece of equipment has an identification number that correlates to an equipment list and a specific case. Photos of the case with the equipment in it are also taken.
This list details the company name, where it was bought, when it was bought, a copy of the receipt, any warranty information, and whether it is still being used or retired/sold and an explanation as to why. I also keep all manuals as well as a photo of the equipment. Always test to make sure you do not receive broken equipment. I’ve had that happen a few times, and the window to having them replaced is very small.
I have been meticulously inspecting each piece of equipment, which requires a significant amount of time. The smallest detail can lead to equipment errors, which can result in the loss of potential evidence or the creation of false evidence. It is crucial to thoroughly understand the specifications of the equipment you are utilizing. Be aware of potential issues and develop strategies to mitigate them.
I have successfully debunked numerous pieces of investigators’ evidence due to a lack of understanding of the equipment they are using. To ensure the optimal functioning of your equipment and minimize the risk of evidence being debunked, it is essential to create an inspection checklist. This checklist will help you maintain the equipment in good working condition, thereby increasing the likelihood of debunking evidence. It is important to note that no equipment can definitively detect spirits, but environmental data can be detected.
While I am open to trying various equipment, the excessive sensitivity of noises and lights often leads individuals to believe they are communicating with spirits when, in reality, these phenomena can be explained. I have personally attempted and sold many pieces of equipment at a fraction of their original cost, as I believe that someone else may find a valuable use for them.
I am once again parting with at least four pieces of equipment that I find to be of little value. I intend to cover these topics in a separate discussion. I would like to conclude by posing two questions to you. Please provide honest and respectful responses. Engaging in a respectful debate is perfectly acceptable, as no one in this field possesses absolute expertise or definitive answers.
What advice would you offer to others regarding the intricacies of equipment?
What is your preferred and least preferred piece of equipment, and why?
Best regards,
Carrie