22/03/2026
đ´ WITHHOLDING INFORMATION ABOUT THE WATERWAYS REZONING PROPOSAL LOOKS LIKE A STRAIGHT BREACH OF THE CODE OF MEETING PRACTICE.âźď¸
The rules arenât complicated.
đŠIf Councillors request information from staff about a matter coming to a meeting, that information MUST also be made available to the public â unless itâs genuinely confidential.
And this Waterways Rezoning Proposal?
It wasnât classified as confidential at either the March 2026 Planning Committee or the upcoming Council meeting.
đ´So, when at the March Planning Committee, a Councillor claimed he needed more time to get answers â and the proposal was deferred because of it â THOSE ANSWERS MUST NOW BE MADE PUBLIC!
Theyâre not.
Which leaves a very simple, unavoidable question:
đ¤Where is the information?
______________________________________________________________
đThis proposal has been BURIED from the very beginning.
đ´Since 2022, itâs been:
đdiscussed behind closed doors
đtreated as confidential
đcompletely withheld from the community
đ´No updates. No visibility. No consultation.
đŠThen thereâs the NSW Planning letter dated 24 October 2025 â the one that didnât support the Councillorsâ proposal.
đŠThat letter was WITHHELD from the public for 18 weeks.
đŠEighteen weeks where the community was kept in the dark about a proposal that directly affects our waterways.
đNow fast forward to March 2026.
đ´The proposal FINALLY appears on a Planning Committee agenda â and is immediately pushed back.
Why?
đ¤Because one Councillor says he hasnât had time to ask questions.
Letâs be clear:
đŠCouncillors have had access to this material since October 2025.
âThe community has had access to nothing.
__________________________________________________________________
đ´AND NOW, THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION USED TO JUSTIFY THE DELAY HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC -DESPITE THE CODE OF MEETING PRACTICE REQUIRING IT!
_____________________________________________________________________
đ´TWO OPTIONS ON THE TABLEâ AND THE ONE THAT ISN'T!
đŠThat October 2025 Department of Planning letter gave Council two pathways if they wanted to proceed:
Option 1: Rezone all affected waterways â but only with $500,000 in specialist environmental studies
Option 2: Scale it back and rely on a risk-based desktop assessment
đCouncil is recommending Option 2.
đ¤But thereâs a glaring problem:
đThere is NO supporting information explaining why this option has been chosen.
NO evidence. NO detailed analysis. NO transparency.
đAnd completely missing from the conversation?
đ´Option 3: Donât proceed at all. Protect the waterways.
đĄThat option hasnât even been acknowledged â let alone considered publicly.
This isnât a new concern.
đ´Councillors have attempted to push this rezoning since 2022:
đwithout environmental studies
đwithout clear safeguards
đwithout engaging the community
đĄIt took the Department of Planning to step in and call it out.
_______________________________________________________________________
â
Meanwhile, just next doorâŚ
â
Georges River Council is doing what proper planning looks like.
â
Theyâve put forward a Biodiversity and Foreshore Planning Proposal thatâs:
â
based on a contemporary biodiversity study
â
shaped by genuine community consultation
â
designed to protect, not exploit, their foreshores
đ˘Their proposal includes:
â
new biodiversity mapping and objectives
â
updated Foreshore Scenic Protection areas
â
stronger Design Excellence based on visual impact to the foreshore areas
đ˘increased foreshore landscape requirements
â
a new Green Corridor approach
â
detailed Local Foreshore Character protections
â
enhanced biodiversity safeguards
đ˘đ˘Itâs thorough. Transparent. Evidence-based.
_______________________________________________________________
âAnd here?
We have NONE of this!
âNO biodiversity or environmental studies
âNO Foreshore Scenic Protection areas
âNO local foreshore Character Statements and protections
âno transparency
âno community voice
âInstead, thereâs a push to increase development along our natural foreshores â with NO checks, NO balances, and NO clear justification.
âAll while key information is withheld, and basic transparency rules have been ignored.
So, below are links to:
đ the Office of Local Govt new Code of Meeting Practice.
đGeorges River Council's Biodiversity and FORESHORE Planning Proposal
https://www.olg.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-02/2025-model-meeting-code-frequently-asked-questions.pdf
https://yoursay.georgesriver.nsw.gov.au/public-exhibition-biodiversity-and-foreshore-planning-proposal-dcp-amendment
âOn Monday night, you can TUNE IN and watch the Public Forum (6pm) and Council Meeting (6.30pm) on Webcast. See link below.
Or you could pop up to Council and watch from the gallery. đżđż
https://www.sutherlandshire.nsw.gov.au/your-council/council-and-committee-meetings